Movies & TV

22878 readers

228 users here now

Rules for Movies & TV Discussion

Any discussion of Disney properties should contain a (cw: imperialism) tag. If your post isn't tagged appropriately it will be removed.
Anti-Bong Joon-ho trolling will result in an immediate ban from c/movies and submitted to the site administrators for review.
On Star Trek Sunday only posts discussing how we might achieve space communism are permitted. Non-Star Trek related content will be removed and you will be temporarily banned until the following Sunday.

Here's a list of tons of leftist movies.

AVATAR 3

Perverts Guide to Ideology

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

WhyEssEff@hexbear.net

Zoift@hexbear.net

Jadzia_Dax@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

Walk_On@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net

Grebgreb@hexbear.net

ultraviolet@hexbear.net

InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.net

Sulvor@hexbear.net

Barbie was fucking snubbed (hexbear.net)

submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by LibsEatPoop@hexbear.net to c/movies@hexbear.net

130 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I saw Barbenheimer the weekend it came out. Oppie is overrated as shit. I liked it but Barbie was 3x better. It’s apparent in the way women are written and the fact that Greta, Margot and Barbie are being snubbed for Nolan is a disgrace.

Oppie isn’t even his best work and it sure as shit doesn’t deserve a dozen fucking Oscar noms.

Whatever criticisms you have of Barbie being white/pop feminism are absolutely tossed aside when fucking OPPENHEIMER is the one winning shit. Cmon.

They’re giving noms to Poor Things instead of it as the “feminist” film cuz they’re cowards scared of women succeeding behind the camera in addition to in front of it and in the box office, and they’re horny teens horned up by Emma Stone and enraged Margot didn’t do that.

Edit- And before you come at me, I saw Oppie on proper film. Don’t tell me I didn’t get it or didn’t have a good experience or whatever. I liked it. But Barbie was better.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] operacion_ogro@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

And i dont think you did understand that the men who take advantage of her are antagonists. Doesnt the film punish them for what they did?

The lawyer is repeatedly punished and the military husband gets shot and turned into a goat, but the rest of the men either got to carry on with their lives with no punishment (her controlling father figure, all the johns that visit the brothel) or are actually rewarded for it (the young surgeon who Gets the Girl despite that he wanted to marry her when he knew she was a mental infant).

Again, my criticism of the movie isn't this theme, it's the glamorous portrayal of the thing the movie is supposedly criticizing. If you're ironically portraying a girl being taken advantage of as sexy, then it's still portraying a girl being taken advantage of as sexy. I really don't think the man who directed it was thinking about how he was skewering men's control over women when he was choosing the perfect angle to film Emma Stone fucking cowgirl style

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The johns explicitly didn’t do anything wrong. They were all just embarrassing guys whose punishment was not being able to be vulnerable to anyone other than a stranger. At least that’s how I read it.

[–] operacion_ogro@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

imo the guy having exhibitionist sex in front of his kids is wrong. The other johns are probably alright, although it is very skeevy when the madame is explaining how some clients enjoy the fact that the women don't want to fuck them

[–] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 2 points 9 months ago

I took that more as people from the 1800s were weird about sex than anything. Obviously it’s still going to strike a nerve because of the context though.