this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
529 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

58166 readers
3984 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 42 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Because they sell the printers at loss, expecting you to buy their overpriced ink, continually earning them money for years.

Sounds like a subscription to be honest.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 23 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I know we assume they're following the "razor blade" model but I actually find it hard to believe the printers are sold at a loss given how cheap it is to produce at this point.

Unless by "loss" we're saying "less than HP thought it could extract."

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

They're absolutely not producing them at a loss. The loss is only in their projections and expectations to price gouge their customers.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

They want to make it a subscription that starts automatically when you buy the printer. No payment or the linked credit card expires, no more printing. Keep on paying for that subscription each month even if you don't print a single page.

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

HP literally has that already. They call their dystopian product "Instant ink."

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And they're fuming because they can't force this down the throat of every "bad investments". Not yet anyway.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But they're really trying with HP+ printers that come with a 3 month trial of Instant Ink. And it's not like you lose the ability to use 3rd party cartridges, because those HP+ printers already come locked down from factory. Those HP+ printers also have extra REQUIREMENTS: HP Account and internet connection.

Imagine if you needed internet connection and some account to control your lights. Oh, Philips Hue changed their ToS, so now you do.

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Why internet of things is a bad idea for 500, Alex.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Here was I, thinking printers couldn’t get worse