this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
798 points (96.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5667 readers
461 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] Peppycito@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Let's see his investment portfolio.

[–] Blackmist 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Here's what I don't get. You can get "ethical" investments, that avoid all the really horrible companies, land mine manufacturers, Nestle, etc, and those investment packages have less returns.

But why can't you get a package with only the awful companies in it, that gives more returns?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

You can. It's called Goldman Sachs Mutual Fund.

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I'm pretty sure I've bought a product owned by Nestle in the past year. Does that make me a monster?