this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2023
798 points (96.7% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

5404 readers
907 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 135 points 9 months ago (2 children)

The house costs around $2.5m in today's money, or around $1.1m in 1990. Household income would have to be north of $300k/yr in 1990 dollars or over $600k in today money.

Kevin's uncle paid for the vacation for 15 or 17 people, which would have cost over $40k in 1990. The uncle also had a penthouse in Paris(where he transferred to, creating the desire to bring the family together for xmas.), Kevin's family stayed in a suite.

Given the neighborhood and proximity to Chicago, the father likely worked in finance.

[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago (2 children)

I don't think you can can you apply the insertion figures to calculate house prices because real estate has increased so much faster than everything else in the last two decades. To put it into perspective, I recall as a kid in the 90s, a friend living in a two story house with a pool next to the beach, and that house cost 400k - which seemed like a lot because we lived in a 3bed house on a suburban half acre block which cost under 200k.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] macrocephalic@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Oh ok. So it's about a 4M house now, maybe more.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Last sold for $2.3m a few years ago, so about $2.5m now.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if it sold for that amount purely on its own merits as a piece of real estate, or if the price was inflated at all because it's the famous Home Alone house.

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

That comes down to the buyer. Most of the houses on that block are north of $1.5M, with a bunch over $2m. That area is very desirable and expensive. At best the price could inflate if a motivated buyer was determined to have the house, but I don't see that reflected in the price.

I think the only house that would be worse to have is the Fast and The Furious house. Instead of people dressed as the characters and taking photos for a few months, you have riced-out straight-piped cars cruising by and parking to take photos constantly.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I lived in a 2 bedroom apartment 1 mile from the beach in the late 90's that was $850. Now the same apartment is going for $3500. Housing prices have reached insane highs. Housing is so expensive now that it's driving people out of the cities, and people are commuting hours every day to work.

[–] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

That home in my city would cost easily 6 million