this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2023
622 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59568 readers
3770 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The way I read the article, the "worth millions" is the sum of the ransom demand.

The funny part is that the exploit is in the "smart" contract, ya know the thing that the blockchain keeps secure by forbidding any updates or patches.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 30 points 11 months ago (5 children)

As crazy as it sounds, some people do.

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 74 points 11 months ago (40 children)

They did. For like a week last year. Then everyone realized it was a scam.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Love how the NFT hype was a big wealth transfer event. So many rich people, like wealthy oil Arabs, bought into the scam and moved so much money into artists pockets while they essentially got nothing in return.

[–] triptrapper@lemmy.world 27 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Is there any way to confirm this? Or are there examples of artists who made a significant amount of money from NFTs? I understand its potential benefit for artists, but I mostly remember already-rich corporations (e.g. UFC) using them as another way to extract money from consumers.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 13 points 11 months ago

That's not really what happened. Some people who had invested in companies that would make money if NFTs went up in value chummed the waters by buying NFTs for huge amounts, convincing a lot of people that NFTs were going to be great investments. Then celebrities with an interest in the scheme pumped up the value too.

That convinced a lot of idiots to "invest" in NFTs, then eventually the bottom fell out of the market.

As for artists, some made some money, but most of the money went into shit like "bored apes" which were algorithmically generated.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My favorite is Murakami, who after selling NFTs he made paintings after all all of them. So which one is the "original"? The actual physical painting, or the digital NFT?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (39 replies)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 21 points 11 months ago (24 children)

It's a great way to launder money.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Better than the current money laundering techniques? Using art appraisals to inflate assets and move dirty money, or straight up using banks like Deutsche or Credit Suisse (RIP) to move dirty money?

[–] Socsa@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 months ago

The smart criminal understands the value of diversity.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I mean yeah, it’s better to launder money using a difficult to trace digital ledger. But no, the things you mentioned won’t go away, because there’s also money in the laundering, and double dipping is the name of the game

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 4 points 11 months ago

Those who buy art and pack it in a safe until it's worth more?

Im glad that doesn't work as well in digital.

[–] Wollang@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago

Seth Green has entered the chat