this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2023
187 points (99.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4113 readers
309 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A maximum indoor temperature working law giving people a day off if workplace temperatures surpass 30C should be mandated by government, a new report recommends.

The report by the Fabian Society thinktank highlights inequalities in who bears the brunt of the impacts of climate breakdown and puts responsibility on bosses and landlords to stop people from overheating.

An increasing number of people are dying from excessive heat in the UK. More than 4,500 people died in England in 2022 due to high temperatures, which was the largest figure on record. Between 1988 and 2022, almost 52,000 deaths associated with the hottest days were recorded in England, with a third of them occurring since 2016, data from the Office for National Statistics shows. During the same 35-year period analysed, more than 2,000 people died in Wales due to the warm temperatures.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think companies wouldn't want to let their employees get off free, so they will probably be the first ones to be against this.

Not sure why climate activists would want people to suffer. Everyone is still hot, doesn't matter if working or not

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Of course companies will be against it.

Not sure why climate activists would want people to suffer.

Some because they think it'll make people more aware of the problem and create more pressure to act, others because they think suffering is a virtue, people deserve it for what they have done to earth, and similar nonsense positions.

[–] soupcat@sopuli.xyz 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I feel like you're just having imaginary arguments in your head with people who don't exist. This is a net win for everyone because it means less people suffering in extreme conditions and it also puts pressure on companies and people with money to slow climate change.

Maybe there's some weird people out there who want others to suffer but I doubt that's anywhere near representative of climate activists.

[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Seen it far too often unfortunately.

And in some cities they got air conditioning banned or de-facto banned (made so expensive with additional hurdles that it's unaffordable for most, ironically often leading to people using extremely inefficient hose-out-the-window monobloc units that you can buy without asking anyone for permission).

[–] soupcat@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 months ago

That sounds pretty silly, the real changes need to come from the ways we generate our electricity, not how individuals use it. I'm mostly just surprised activists managed to affect policy at all, though. But still that sounds more misguided than malicious.