this post was submitted on 11 Dec 2023
32 points (79.6% liked)
JavaScript
1982 readers
1 users here now
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Pretty sure they meant
match
as in pattern matching, notswitch
as in switch/case/break.You can see the proposal here: https://github.com/tc39/proposal-pattern-matching
Your probably right, that looks quite desirable.
Nah, I meant switch, as that's what it's called in C#-land. See above.
That proposal for matching looks interesting, but not quite the same, no.
Are you sure?
Your C# example:
JS proposal for match:
Aha, yeah, I see it now. Looking forward to it.
they also said switch
expressions
, which indicates they want the switch statement to be settable directly to a variable with whatever the return type of the switch is.Match already returns the value which can be thrown into a variable.