this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
888 points (100.0% liked)

196

16851 readers
1433 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] starship_lizard@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago (7 children)
[–] chalkman@sh.itjust.works 83 points 2 years ago (106 children)

Hard-core authoritarian communist. The kinda peeps who support Stalin and shit

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 33 points 2 years ago (13 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron? 😂 like the whole point of communism is that there isn't a ruling class. I guess Russia and China were never really communist, just statist authoritarian right? I mean, the Nazis called themselves Socialist. They were nowhere near that

[–] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 30 points 2 years ago

Isn’t “authoritarian communist” kind of an oxymoron?

Yes. Yes, it is. I sometimes call them “pseudocommunists” for this reason.

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Isn't "authoritarian communist" kind of an oxymoron?

Most real life implementations of communism used an authoritarian one party system. You can say these aren't true examples of communism, but that just ends up sounding like cope unfortunately.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy@beehaw.org 24 points 2 years ago

None of those states ever gave economic or political power to the working classes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 years ago

As how Marx outlined Communism as the evolution of Capitalism once it reaches a scale of production that everyone can have their needs met, resulting in a classless, stateless, moneyless society, then yes authoritarian communist is an oxymoron.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (105 replies)
[–] lauchmelder@einweckglas.com 44 points 2 years ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] limbo99@lemmy.ml 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's the prog-lib equivalent of woke. It's used dismiss leftists with out engaging with our arguments. The term has lite ideological or argumentative use.

[–] Darorad@lemmy.world 36 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Libs use it that way, actual leftists use it to describe fascists that think they're on the left and like red flags.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)