this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
924 points (98.7% liked)

News

23387 readers
3398 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Modva@lemmy.world 60 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It will not stop. The government won't step in, because they are all in on it. Their money comes first, above all else. The way they treat me homeless people today is how you will be treated tomorrow.

There is only one way to stop the runaway cancer of greed, and it's not by writing angry notes.

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 15 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I feel like the answer is a tax strike. Most of what taxes do today is move money from the poor to the rich, while occasionally moving some from the middle class to the poor (and constantly threatening to take that away). A tax strike could break all of this pretty quickly, or at least force them to attack and show what they're really about.

A tax strike could take care of a number of problems, like this and the complete unwillingness to address climate change.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

If you were to actually get people to participate in a tax strike, the government would just round everyone up for something like tax fraud or some other tax related crime and ship them to the for profit prisons and make them even more money. Only solution would be, in my opinion, to overthrow the rich and let their heads roll.

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Actually, there are a lot of people who do tax resistence for religious reasons. Quakers regularly resist taxes because they assert their religious right not to pay for war. There are both legal and illegal ways to resist.

Let's compare two scenarios: (1) a large number of people carry out a peaceful tax strike and are arrested, (2) people start killing "the rich."

In scenario 1, even after arresting people the system is still starved of resources. A violent reaction could even elicit more people to join or prompt a violent resistence that would overthrow the system.

In scenario 2, if people actually end up killing anyone they're arrested or just straight killed. They are seen as crazy people. The dead rich people are replaced with new rich people. Nothing changes. This has been tried a lot of times before. Even getting to the point of killing one billionaire would take several people working together. Spend some time just imagining how it would actually work, like how a plan like that would actually work, and you'll understand why it's not a good first option.

[–] guacupado@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The dead rich people are replaced with new rich people. Nothing changes.

It will absolutely change things. The only reason this won't work is because things aren't actually bad enough yet that anyone is willing to go to jail for this. I don't even want to go to into detail because I don't know if that'll get my banned or put on a list (lol) but if enough if the rich are publicly brutalized, it'd make the next person hesitant. This isn't a movie where there's always another evil general ready to replace the first.

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

If that was going to work it would have on September 6th 1901. It didn't work then, or any other time. Do whatever you want, but if you want to be useful there are much more effective things to do. Honestly, rich people are also trapped in this machine.

Capitalism, like patriarchy, means suffering for everyone involved. This includes the dominant group. They are also victims, just in a very different way. Brutalizing them would do nothing because they're already afraid. That's why they're killing us. They're afraid that if they give up power we'll exact revenge. That's why they can't just stop even though they know we'll all die.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago
[–] Modva@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As a thought exercise sure, that would work if it could be done at coordinated scale.

Practically though, doesn't seem achievable considering how manipulated most of the population is on billionaires.

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

It depends on how it's done. It definitely requires scale to work, but it's not unachievable and it doesn't have to start at scale. I don't even think the majority of the population is that manipulated. The majority wants radical change. Authoritarianism relies on the illusion that most people are brainwashed, and that illusion simply isn't true.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you’re a W2 you never even see the money that gets taken for taxes

[–] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 1 points 11 months ago

There are a lot of mechanisms for tax resistence, legal and illegal. One is to just claim 100% deductions and refuse to pay at the end of the year. This is absolutely illegal, but civil disobedience often is.

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 0 points 11 months ago

Why people are mad at the USA