this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
1682 points (97.8% liked)

Political Memes

5479 readers
3410 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bye@lemmy.world 95 points 11 months ago (9 children)

Our taxes fund more public health dollars per capita than almost anywhere else in the world. Medicare and Medicaid spending is higher than DOD budget, and that’s before you include medical research funded by NIH and DOD or VA spending.

The issue is that our prices are out of control because of regulatory capture and downstream inability of the government to negotiate lower prices.

What we need are price controls.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

look, your argument is fair but inaccurate. When the Insurance company’s negotiated rate on a heart attack is 14k, but the hospital bills you 300k, then the problem is we’ve allowed for private healthcare to make more sense and forced government funded healthcare to be overly complex.

Let me repeat this but in capitalism, we have DONE THIS PURPOSELY so that private healthcare companies can make money.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"The issue is that our prices are out of control because of regulatory capture and downstream unwillingness of the governmemt to negotiate lower prices."

FIFY!

[–] Redfugee@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It's not about unwillingness. Negotiating lower prices requires collective bargaining. In the US there are so many different insurance companies and each one has to negotiate prices for its relatively small pool. Contrast that with countries like Canada which have a single system, giving them the ability to negotiate prices for the whole country.

I wouldn't call it unwillingness, Obama did try to create a public option.

[–] ugh@lemm.ee 7 points 11 months ago

Our tax dollars fund more corporations than other countries. The military spends so much because they pay private companies for their equipment, which is sold at inflated costs because they can. The US spends a shit ton on health care because private companies inflate their prices because, again, they can. The government/insurance companies don't even pay the full price that's listed on the bill, but they still use the original numbers.

You can't compare our spending to other countries. The US spends more because they pay inflated prices. Citizens spend less because we can't afford to get health care.

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 7 points 11 months ago

That's what happens if you don't have public health care.

A small insurer or even an uninsured person cannot bargain with large pharma companies. If they try to, the pharma company will just not sell the product, because it's more expensive for them to lower the prices for everyone compared to losing one small customer.

But if your whole country's health system bargains at once, it can get much better deals, because not taking a deal means for the pharma company that they'll lose access to millions of potential customers.

That's why for example in Europe Insulin costs about 10% per dose compared to what people in the USA have to pay.

[–] ben_dover@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

so if they put such a generous amount in, why isn't healthcare free then, like in Europe? if i have the flu and go to the doctor, even the medication they prescribe is subsidised, i pay max 6 bucks for everything

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago

Insurance companies. Because of the way they operate, healthcare providers are forced to raise prices as high as possible so that they can actually afford to operate once the insurance companies negotiate the lowest price for care they can.

And then the insurance companies charge consumers high prices anyway and pocket the difference.

[–] solariplex@slrpnk.net 5 points 11 months ago

Indeed, what good is all that public health spending when health corporations and orgs are determined to maximize profit, and no authority is willing to curtail their efforts

[–] orrk@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

It's not regulatory capture, it's a complete lack of federal regulatory guidelines in regard to the insurance industry.

for a medical service provider to be insured (and thus not be destroyed by the first malpractice suit they lose) they need insurance, the insurance companies have their own stipulations onto the healthcare provider, like all their stuff being certified, now guess who owns the respective certification companies? letting them charge whatever they damned well please...

it's straight up duopolistic markets