this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
112 points (90.0% liked)

Games

32674 readers
640 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
quinten@lemmy.world
shitpostpolice@lemmy.world
Dremor@lemmy.world
Dremor@jlai.lu
112
'The Witcher 4 will channel the “freedom” of CDPR’s Cyberpunk 2077' (www.pcgamesn.com)
submitted 11 months ago by Carighan@lemmy.world to c/games@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

“Our trademark is the freedom given to the player, but always with limits,” Kalemba tells Lega Nerd

Aye, they try to hype the idea of a main quest line as something that defines their design.

😅

Thinking back I'm not sure I want Witcher 4 to feel more like CP2077, tbh. Less, if anything.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] quams69@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I got it at release as well and I could not disagree more. It was buggy, broken, and incomplete. I watched police NPCs spawn in from the sky, my game softlocked when a story essential npc fell through the world. These were commonly observed issues, among a litany of other ones. You gotta have some serious rose tinted glasses to think it was an acceptable product on release.

Imo Gameplay and story were like a 2.5/5, went back for PL and it might be a 3. Gameplay is serviceable at best. Story was lifted from an GITS:SAC episode which is about the most praise I have for the game aside from the art department. The 3D assets in 2077 are inarguably beautiful.

[–] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I know survivor bias or w/e but literally no one I know irl who played it 10+ had those issues unless they were on console.

I played it for over a hundred hours immediately after release and only saw a few minor bugs like audio/lip animations not matching for some scenes. I don’t know how all my friends/coworkers were so lucky when all you see on the internet is “worst game ever, doesn’t work at all on release” comments

[–] breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 months ago

Same! Pre-ordered and played hundreds of hours. It should've been released 6 months later but most of the bugs weren't game-breaking. If an NPC had their arms stretched out to the side or whatever, I'd just have a laugh and move on. I've had to reload a save to get a side quest to trigger twice. I don't think it's even ever crashed on me though.

It's just become blindly accepted that it is/was unplayable. I remember seeing so many articles months, even a year, after its release just confused about how so many people could be playing this unplayable game. Yet it's always been consistently in Steam's top 25 games for active players. It's a weird disconnect.

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Same experience here. I’m pretty sure at least 75% of the complaints were from consoles that should have never had the game released for.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yet the game was still released and marketed to them - thus the issue

[–] BURN@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

It definitely shouldn’t have been, but that doesn’t mean the game is shit, just marketing is bad.