this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2023
1 points (66.7% liked)
General Discussion
1 readers
1 users here now
More focused on general discussion and open-ended questions. For news and latest events, please use !main@soccer.forum.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
He wasn’t right. Lots of attackers have thrived under Simeone. Felix isn’t willing to work hard enough in the system like a Griezmann
Lots MORE attackers have thrived at barcelona. ergo, he IS right by your own logic
yes, this is correct... but that doesn't make him wrong. his comments are easier to thrive at barca in the possession style, not impossible to thrive at athleti. what he said is factually true for him and his style 100%.
Lol, no, not even remotely close. He is very wrong, and so are you.
Since Simeone came to Atleti, only Messi, Neymar and Suarez have really thrived. Maybe Villa and Lewa first season.
Griezman, Dembele, Zlatan, Auba, Alexis Sanchez, Depay, Alcacer, Munir, Brainwaite, Boateng... Neither of those was really a success.
Now, on Atlético, pretty much every striker they signed became a star and was sold for massive profit: Falcao, Griezmann, Costa, Forlán, Agüero. And to a point, Mandzukic and Villa.
Felix is the first real flop.
I disagree, so many Barca attackers have failed or not lived up to their potential. At athletico id say not as many