this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1008 points (94.3% liked)

Greentext

4348 readers
1123 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works
1008
Anon searches for normal politics (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 11 months ago by Early_To_Risa@sh.itjust.works to c/greentext@sh.itjust.works
306 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nixcamic@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

And most communist states have actually just been fascists. Like, the USSR and China didn't really have the people owning the means of production, or anything near equality, egalitarianism, or fair wealth distribution.

[–] Sanyanov@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Actually, I don't have numbers on China, but in USSR throughout most of properly recorded economic history 10% of the wealthiest people owned about 20% of all money in the country, give or take depending on the year. In modern Russia, it is about 65% from what I remember, and that doesn't include offshore funds of the oligarchs.

Also, they weren't fascist by any definition. Authoritarian - yes. Fascist - no.

Not arguing for anything here, both countries could be way better, but your claims are wrong.