This is only true if it's literally true that it has to be "first person". There are, in my opinion, way too many 3rd person semi-RPGs with a vast, open world that are very similar to Bethesda games. It has gotten to the point with me where there are only so many games like this I'll even play, because they're huge time drains and they come across as basically the same game with a different skin or setting.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

3rd person semi-RPGs with a vast, open world that are very similar to Bethesda games

With the "charm" of Bethesda game(that I don't really know how exactly to describe) the only other recent games I can think of are Outer Worlds and Cyberpunk.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think that may be right for first person only, but many games that are largely played in third person fit the bill to me: Witcher 3, Elden Ring, Horizon, and even the latest Zelda games to an extent.

I know I'm leaving many other titles out here too, I'm just listing ones I've personally played.

No Man's Sky is even close to being on the list IMO but it's not quite RPG enough to fit in the same category.

Players are really kinda spoiled for choice when it comes to large, open world games with quasi RPG elements.

I've personally grown kinda sick of the genre.

There's standouts of course (I actually think all the ones I listed are pretty excellent), but all of them require hundreds of hours to complete and I'm just sick of the same game type after a while.

[–] aidan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think that may be right for first person only

It's not so much about the first personness of it. It is just that the only examples of games I can think of that meet what I'm talking about are first person. I never played Horizon or Zelda games(past the OG), but for the Witcher 3 and Elden Ring I personally never enjoyed them- despite genuinely trying, mainly because of the style of combat(an actually Bethesda games give you much more choice, but also more clunkiness in that) but also because of imo a lack of engaging freedom(or psuedochoice) in dialogue. Although, Witcher is definitely closer, but Elden Ring felt like an RPG only in that you had stats. Fallout: NV was not fun because of the stats, Fallout: NV was fun because it felt like you could immerse yourself and engage with a living world in a way that actually felt somewhat free. There's a reason there are so many Youtube videos with premises like "playing Skyrim as chef" or whatever, it is fun to build your own stories, with your own character, in a world that it feels like they can genuinely interact with. FROM Soft games I think intentionally make you feel detached from the world, and the Witcher has you following the story of an existing character. The interaction and choice in Bethesda games is definitely often shallow, but at least it exists.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't played it but if that stuff is what you're looking for I think baldurs gate 3 might be for you.

I've never really felt like the dialogue choices in any Bethesda game save maybe new vegas (which I don't even think was technically a Bethesda game) had a lot of real impact on the game. In Skyrim I think there were maybe a handful of times that it mattered. Most times in those types of games I wind up exercising the entire dialogue tree because usually it lets you, and sometimes that's the only way to get some side quest or whatever.

The combat in Bethesda games save some of the Fallout series is actually pretty bad IMO. In Skyrim, the combat doesn't feel like combat at all and feels more like two characters swiping air near each other.

The thing that's the most disappointing about most of these games to me is the squandered potential. At first there feels like there's depth there, and if you try to get there it is shown to be a facade.

They have a lot of breadth to their games but IMO they're as deep as a puddle.