Data Hoarder

3 readers

1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@selfhosted.forum

Are NAS-rated drives REALLY worth it? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by I-Should-Travel@alien.top to c/datahoarder@selfhosted.forum

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm not anywhere close to the point where I'll be constantly transferring data. I'll be using it mostly as a plex server, not yet remotely for other people or myself either. Is the premium for NAS drives truly warranted for the average user? Or at that point, are NAS rated drives more just the only way to get drives over 5TB~ capacity in the first place?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SamSausages@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I think in general they have lower RPM and run a bit cooler and use a little less power. That usually comes with a bit less performance.

But I'm hooked on the WD Ultrastar series. Server Grade and fast. Also has low power usage, at full tilt, mine use less than 10w each. I'm running 20 hc530's and been rock solid.