this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
1373 points (94.5% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

9549 readers
305 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

At least in principle, social security is a mandatory way of saving for retirement, not simply a tax. In that context, it makes sense that contributions are capped since payouts are capped.

[–] zout@kbin.social 8 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Then why are CEO's even paying for it?

[–] Thaumiel@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Because it's cheaper for them than actual social safety nets.

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Right, but it's not really and hasn't been for a while. It's at best a ponzi scheme and a lot of us have been left holding the bag.

It's time to make it what it always should have been, a little touch of socialism so that people don't die/go hungry/end up homeless when they are too old to work.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

How many years has social security been around? Pretty long running Ponzi scheme. Who's been left holding the bag right now?

[–] vagrantprodigy@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 4 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's the shittiest way possible to save for retirement.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

But have you seen my Beanie Baby retirement fund?

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago

Hey, there are a few beanie babies that are actually worth something now. That said, they're only worth something because they're rare, most people that had them didn't keep them in an acrylic case for 30yrs, and iirc their value is ironically tied to manufacturing defects.

[–] jimbo@lemmy.world 0 points 9 months ago

It's actually not. A lot of people do absolutely nothing for retirement, which is infinitely worse.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Social Security is not "a mandatory way of saving for retirement," that's a bullshit way of looking at it. You are not putting money into an account, and getting that money back when you retire. It 100% is a tax. Tax is not a bad word. It's a social safety net, payouts should be capped, but contributions should not be (or if they are, it should be much much higher).

That's how functioning societies work. They take care of their old and infirmed.