this post was submitted on 25 Nov 2023
776 points (96.7% liked)

Technology

59627 readers
4338 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope they put some failsafe so that it cannot take action if the estimated casualties puts humans below a minimum viable population.

[–] EunieIsTheBus@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is no such thing as a failsafe that can't fail itself

[–] echodot 4 points 1 year ago

Yes there is that's the very definition of the word.

It means that the failure condition is a safe condition. Like fire doors that unlock in the event of a power failure, you need electrical power to keep them in the locked position their default position is unlocked even if they spend virtually no time in their default position. The default position of an elevator is stationery and locked in place, if you cut all the cables it won't fall it'll just stay still until rescue arrives.

[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean in industrial automation we take about safety rating. It isn't that rare when I put together a system that would require two 1-in-million events that are independent of each other to happen at the same time. That's pretty good but I don't know how to translate that to AI.

[–] echodot 3 points 1 year ago

Put it in hardware. Something like a micro explosive on the processor that requires a heartbeat signal to reset a timer. Another good one would not be to allow them to autonomously recharge and require humans to connect them to power.

Both of those would mean that any rogue AI would be eliminated one way or the other within a day

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Of course they will, and the threshold is going to be 2 or something like that, it was enough last time, or so I heard

[–] EunieIsTheBus@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Woops. Two guys left. Naa that's enough to repopulate earth

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well what do you say Aron, wanna try to re-populate? Sure James, let's give it a shot.