GenZedong

4298 readers

114 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

GrainEater@lemmygrad.ml

Elara@lemmygrad.ml

ComradePupIvy@lemmygrad.ml

American_Communist22@lemmygrad.ml

105

Israel-Gaza war: only a two-state solution can bring real peace, China president says in first public speech on conflict (www.scmp.com)

submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by Imnecomrade@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

105 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Um, I am not sure how I feel about this. Why would Xi support a two-state solution? Isn't it more justified to have a one-state solution and return all of the land to the Palestinians? Won't a two-state solution eventually lead us back to another genocide? This feels off. I did not expect Xi to make such a statement.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

That's exactly what I expected him to say It's entirely consistent with Chinese foreign policy for this to be their conclusion.

Israel are never going to agree to just pack the whole thing up and leave and no one can make them. I therefore agree a two state solution with defined borders is the only thing I can realistically see ending the violence

[–] taiphlosion@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 11 months ago

Not without Palestine having an effective military, what exactly is going to stop Israel from continuing it's ethnic cleansing? What's stopping the US from sanctioning the new Palestinian state like they do the DPRK?

[–] booty@hexbear.net 12 points 11 months ago (2 children)

no one can make them.

A collaborative effort by, like, 3 or 4 people in the US could probably do it. But they're the people with the least interest in doing such a thing

[–] Fissionami@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 11 months ago

But they’re the people with the least interest in doing such a thing.

Ironically they're the ones sheltering israel in middle east.

[–] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago

they could make them stop continuing to genocide the palestinians. I don't think America could make them give back all the stuff