this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
311 points (97.3% liked)

You Should Know

33063 readers
195 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason "Why" YSK:

**In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content. **



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Apollo can't afford Reddit's fees and will be subject to auto-refund for shutting down, so users can help by declining the refund.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's not wrong. The owning class, the billionaires, are so ridiculously farther ahead that it makes millionaires middle class.

And this is why we need to tax them out of existence.

"Make Millionaires 'Rich' Again"

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That may be as it is, but that does not make the richest 5% of any population middle class.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It absolutely does when 90% of the wealth is grouped in the top one or two percent.

The difference between a millionaire and a homeless person is tiny compared to the difference between a millionaire and a billionaire.

[–] Chobbes@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Wouldn't the middle class be centered around the median, which would be completely unaffected by extreme outliers (such as the top 5%)?

I agree with the sentiment that the difference between a billion and a million is about a billion and all, and I'm not sure how things are actually defined... But I would think that it would make sense to use median income (instead of mean income) to determine what the "middle" class is precisely to avoid skew from outliers.

[–] redballooon@lemm.ee -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I suggest you tell the next homeless person that he’s practically a millionaire, when compared to Elon Musk, and see his face light up. He’ll thank you for the really useful reference point that practically gets him off the street.

[–] Artemis@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

That’s not what the word “practically” means and no one above you suggested such.

[–] SgtThunderC_nt@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I agree with you that he's better off than most people, but do you consider a boomer who bought a house for $150k in 1980, that's now work $1m in 2023, to be upper class? Technically there's plenty of upper middle class people worth $1-2m.

[–] Tag365@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Millionaires are only middle class now? What?

[–] paciencia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A million seconds is 12 days. A billion seconds is 31 years. That's how far income inequality has come. So yes, millionaires are middle class. I know so many people that think they are well off but are stupidly poor when compared to the top 1%