this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
132 points (82.4% liked)
Anarchism
1286 readers
1 users here now
Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I appreciate your effort to be diplomatic
You might want to reconsider your idea of what they care about, though.
I'm not sure if you're aware but db0 has been working on CSAM filtering, safe federation lists and similar.
Maybe cut them some slack? That's certainly more work than I put in.
They can be praised and thanked for their actions in one instance and criticized for their actions in other instances.
I didn't remember, though if this is the AI guy then I did read the post. I still need to question the deeply antisocial behavior patterns when it comes to anything having to do with communication, though.
Not that we shouldn't give them credit for whatever good they do, we should.
I think you're being a bit hyperbolic generalising deeply antisocial communication habits from a stupid flame war.
Is it hyperbolic when the flame war was of their making and has been stoked and perpetuated by that same user posting more and more about it ever since?
Yes it is. Being teased in a comment section is one of the mildest things that can happen to you online.
Deeply antisocial is language that applies to stuff like the extremely normal rape and death threats, dick pics, and harassment that happens all the time.
It's not like they're pming you, just view a different page.
And that is why you're siding with the person that made this entire thread (and the prior thread it refers to) because of reasons totally not like "being teased in a comment section."
Unlike the poster you're championing, who needs to heroically continue the crybully crusade.
This is peak brainrot, I've taken pains to highlight that I do not in fact agree with their current conduct. Of course, since I think you're being hyperbolic I must endorse a stupid flamewar!
Just... go outside, say hi to a neighbour, have a normal interaction with someone, realise this whole thing is trivial and stupid.
Anyway, I have a note here that this isn't the only toxic interaction I've had with you, so I think I'm just going to block you and get on with my day. I hope you can relax a bit, and not get so worked up about trivial shit in the future.
Your hypocrisy is astounding enough that absolutely everything you just said applies at least as much to yourself, especially because you're the one concern trolling about my mental wellness or lack thereof, all because of a "stupid flamewar" as you put it.
I don't know if you're just a hypocritical stan for a perfect internet stranger or just that internet stranger's thinly veiled alt, but take your own advice. In fact crush up that advice and snort it for faster absorption.
Please.
You've got another person here saying it is one step down from violence. Does it depend on the sect of the person doing it?
I mean how many dozens of times does a behavior need to be demonstrated before we can call ot a pattern?
I think it would be more useful if you read the rest of the thread than I rehash my thoughts
Even just a ballpark number would be nice.
When someone is posting enough to be nearly half the flame war, including resurrecting it in a new thread because they just need the attention ig, it provides a pretty large data set.