this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2023
1293 points (83.1% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1321 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And that is a problem to whom? Every single state is authoritarian, the question is whose interests are they protecting.

China is clearly a dictatorship of the proletariat and they use authority to protect the interests of the proletariat. Yes, sometimes their policy is wrong and does harm but ultimately they work to improve their policies, governing is a learning experience after all.

[–] TheSanSabaSongbird@lemdro.id -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's a problem because people don't feel like stakeholders when they don't have a say and can't participate in their system of governance. This in turn means that they aren't incentivized to willingly participate and have to be forced or indoctrinated, both of which are violations of human rights.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you think people there don't participate in elections? The party has literally 100 million members, people in China are politically involved.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When was their last general election?

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And how many parties were they allowed to make selections from? Were there any candidates that weren't pre-approved by the leading party?

[–] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

One party where a basic platform is defined and differences are expressed vibrantly on top of that is better than two parties that brand themselves as different but only offer a couple of aesthetic differences and concessions to keep people mad at the opposing party and not the underlying structure

[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...You're really saying that one party where you have no functional choice is better than a multi-party system, just because you think that Republicans and Dems are too alike, while ignoriing the plethora of other parties that not only actually exist in the US, but hold office at local and state level?

Shouldn't expect any more from a tankie though.

[–] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago

friend. You're so worried about a one party system because you're thinking of American parties. You know how Mike Bloomberg and Bernie Sanders are both ran under the same party? In a proper single party state there's more range than that.

[–] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

One party with multiple functional approaches that get whittled down through democratic consensus is more democratic than being told to pick between two relatively similar options. There is more of a gap between liberals and Maoists in the CPC, both of which hold power in office, than there are between the democrats and republicans.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People that want to participate in politics can join the CPC, in fact it has more than 100m official members. Also inside the CPC there are several factions with differents views, so no its not a monolithic entity.

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago

It is one party. It is the only party. It is monolithic.