this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
789 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

59652 readers
4997 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Number1SummerJam@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Intrusive and sneaky ads like the ones on YouTube should be heavily regulated if not illegal.

Edit: especially ads louder than the average content volume, repetitive jingles designed to get stuck in your head, billboards, and ads thrown in the middle of the video you’re watching

[–] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

"Loud" is unfortunately hard to quantify. There's a lot of psychoacoustics that mean that the number of decidels really doesn't tell you what's loud and what's not.

This is a great demo of how sounds can appear extremely loud without actually being physically very loud: https://youtu.be/tONF9OSUOSw?t=7m16s

Anyway the point is that it's hard to make rules about this kind of thing, because sound is subjective and there are ways to circumvent any restrictions you make.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 3 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/tONF9OSUOSw?t=7m16s

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] yesterdayshero@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Sounds like you haven't watched a lot of free to air tv haha

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can honestly say, apart from seeing it on on the background when visiting parents or similar, that I haven't watched free to air TV in maybe 15 years. Been streaming or downloading all that time.

[–] yesterdayshero@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hardly watch it either. Just found it funny all the complaints above could be applied to what free to air tv has been doing for decades.

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Agree with you completely.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Free to air is heavily regulated in my country if it had a fraction of the fraudulent grifter ads Google would be shut down

[–] yata@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ads in those are also regulated in civilised countries.

[–] RelentlessArts 1 points 1 year ago

Luckily all that is prosecutable by Ofcom here so it very rarely happens.

[–] wooki@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Googles ad platform is utterly full of fraudulent scams and grifters. Bring on regulations and HEAVY fines for Google making profit of fraud and crimes.