this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2023
1906 points (99.0% liked)

Political Memes

5492 readers
3207 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't personally think taxes should be used for punishment, but I think the rules of a system should be setup to achieve the desired outcome. The rules right now are setup to benefit a few entities owning most of the real estate, and we need to build a system that makes it more expensive to own homes if you already own a home, and it should scale based on how many you already have. Also, there should be penalties for gouging people. All the pharma bros who have been hiking the price of medications through the roof have revealed that most of the people in the USA are vulnerable to captive markets.

[–] rchive@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The rules right now are setup to benefit a few entities owning most of the real estate

Rules like what?

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The rules right now are setup to benefit a few entities owning most of the real estate,

Strange then, that this has not occurred.

They currently own 4.7mm out of ~75mm homes. It's just more in Cali, which is probably where the person you heard this from lives.

Here's an article warning against the practice with data

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/04/magazine/wall-street-landlords.html

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

we need to build a system that makes it more expensive to own homes if you already own a home,

I don’t know how most places work, but my state does this by assessing property at whatever rate, for everyone, but you get an exemption on part of the assessed value for your primary residence. My house is taxed as though it were worth $60k less because it’s where I live, not an investment or business . This seems like a good idea that would do exactly as you suggest (although that exemption should arguably be higher and should increase once in a while)