this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2023
359 points (84.5% liked)

Memes

45585 readers
1497 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Todd Howard: "You may need to upgrade your PC for this game"

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] eochaid@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

This is the most disingenuous comparison I've ever seen lol. You basically took a picture of a babbling Brook at noon and a waterfall at night and are somehow confused why they don't look the same.

First of all, your still shot is purposefully omitting the movement of the waterfall, the fact that it actually behaves and moves like a spray of liquid and gas particles, you know, like an actual waterfall, rather than just a moving block with a shader texture applied to it.

You also took this picture at dusk, when the plaza is draped in shadow and there is no sunlight directly bouncing off. If you'd even been to a waterfall this tall in such conditions in real life, you'd know they actually look more like this - like a non-descript spray of gas - than the Elex screenshot.

If you were to take a picture of the water in the day time, you know, when there is sunlight to bounce off the water particles, it would look absolutely beautiful. Which is also why nobody goes to waterfalls at night expecting a goddamn vista.

This game isn't perfect but one thing it is, is absolutely beautiful (with the exception of some well documented and unimportant NPCs). And calling Elex a better looking game than Starfield is the dumbest take I've heard yet.

[–] lichtmetzger@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The shot wasn't done at night, it was made during the day. You can clearly see sunlight in the image that shines onto the structure on the left.

First of all, your still shot is purposefully omitting the movement of the waterfall

That's called a screenshot. How am I supposed to capture the movement of a texture in a still image? It also doesn't make a whole lot of difference. The waterfall still looks like sewage even when it moves. Contrary to your claims, a real waterfall does not look like this, even at night or in the shadows. Why would the water be dark gray? It builds up foam when it falls down, so it's white. There are numerous pictures out there on the web of waterfalls in shadows and they all look white. Just an example.

Your whole post reads like you somehow need to defend this game at all cost. I had a lot of fun with Starfield, but the technical issues are glaringly obvious. And there is no shame in admitting that. Especially, since this is just meant to be a meme for shits and giggles. ;)

This game isn’t perfect but one thing it is, is absolutely beautiful

I'm sorry, but that is not true at all. There are beautiful areas, like the Neon planet, for example. But there are also a lot of barren planets with barely any materials or assets on them and these look really, really bad.

I just fired up the game again and landed on a random planet in my area (Al-Battani 1-C):

It's just the same type of rock everywhere and the same type of hill everywhere. To me, this just looks boring and visually uninteresting.

Compared to that, the Neon world looks great:

Neon is probably what you had in mind. But you cannot say that the game is "absolutely beautiful" with these extreme jumps in visual quality. And this meme is an example for an area on the main hub world that looks bad, so even those aren't always well-made either.

[–] Defaced@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Starfield plays like shit, looks like shit (by today's standards) and the quests are shit. Neon is a lazy world that only ends up becoming one giant hallway with a few shops. Everywhere else feels lifeless and boring. Starfield was a flop, and while Elex isn't the best game out there, the fact that it can in fact in some situations stand toe to toe with Starfield on graphical fidelity is just an absolute disgrace. I was on a desert planet in Starfrield in the main story (can't remember the name) at night, on a balcony running on GeForce Now with an RTX 2080 and getting less than 24FPS, that's absolutely pathetic, game is just bad.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

I have to agree wholeheartedly

[–] CountryBreakfast@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Par for the course for a lot of starfield content. OP doesn't have a point to make even if it wasn't such a corrupt attempt to say something. It's just more contrived outrage.