this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
1251 points (93.2% liked)

Political Memes

5492 readers
2039 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] centof@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

A well implemented UBI would be funded by a progressive tax system that taxes rich people more heavily that anyone else. If that is the case a rich persons taxes would end up increasing more than the UBI amount. At the same time everyone else's taxes may increase some but the UBI would more than cover the increase. That would lead to a net decrease in inequality.

Social corrections to existing system are superior. Not everyone should get the same. Some people need more, some need less.

A UBI as described above is a social correction. In essence it would redistribute money from those who have plenty of excess money to those who are struggling.

but UBI will not accomplish that.

This is just your opinion. How do you know it won't accomplish that when it has never been implemented at scale?

Social-democratic systems such as Western and northern Europe already have, do, to reasonable extent.

Ultimately a UBI can achieve a similar end result as the social-democratic systems. The key is in making sure it is implemented well. UBI is just a way of achieving the same goal in a different way.