this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
61 points (90.7% liked)

GenZedong

4290 readers
99 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Max Blumenthal also posted a few articles that seemed to tacitly suggest that green energy and climate change are hysteric concerns.

[โ€“] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Link the articles, because green washing is a real problem. Libs keep throwing money at electric cars and slightly greener luxury products that are still horrible (5% less bad yearly-iPhone upgrade), and attack things like diesel buses in cases where an introduction of a diesel bus will not only be net reduction, but a reduction even compared to buying a brand new electric bus from an imperial core country.

I mean I don't know, I strongly disagree with his anti-vax stance, and so it's not crazy to imagine that he'd have some bad opinion on climate change, but I also absolutely understand groaning when listening to two-faced north libs say the way to solve climate change is LNG.

[โ€“] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I never said that green-washing wasn't a problem or an important issue, my issue is that Max Blumenthal seemed to disregard all of that actual science and just throw it in the trash.

I might have misremembered, I thought this story was written by Blumenthal, or I might be confusing it with another:

https://thegrayzone.com/2022/12/08/dutch-farmers-technocratic-plan/

[โ€“] Aria@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 year ago

It's his outlet, so holding him accountable for who he platforms is fair.

[โ€“] chocoraisinboi@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So its wrong that dutch farmers arent ok with a neoliberal agenda that will most likely sell their land to black rock?

If this is it then it's a weak argument to take him down with

[โ€“] Buchenstr@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

These protests were funded by agricultural corporations to fight government environmental regulations, these hogs can really go fuck themselves for all I care.

Most western european farmers are bourgeois traitors who would gladly sell their country out to blackrock if it meant they got a few hundred quid in their bank.

[โ€“] QueerCommie@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 year ago

The thing the article is complaining about is evil climate regulation trying to stop industrial agriculture (which greatly pollutes and robs the soil while requiring vast inputs).

[โ€“] cayde6ml@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 year ago

I am half-awake so please bare with me, but unless I misread it, those farmers seemed more concerned about their profits than the environment is my point.