this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
-1 points (33.3% liked)

General Discussion

11950 readers
133 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse and Feddit Lemmy Community Browser!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi, I’m the author of @nitrofuel, a semi-automated tech news bridge to different Lemmy’s communities and instances. This is not a standard bot, beacuse all links have to be review by the mantainer (at the moment, me) before the bot can post it on all communities (about 14 are registred in the main dataset); i know this is kinda spammy, but the idea is to still keep a medium content-quality threshold. The bot user just got banned, after less than an hour of running?

Is it possible to be unbaned? Is there a limit of posts/communities? Is there an higher content-quality threshold? I can change how the system works, but I wanted to ask for a possibility to be unbanned / recreate the account with infranging ToS, in order to build a better platform.

(P.S. The Nitrofuel bridge is also designed to slow the content output if the user partecipation goes up, in order to slowly fade away when a lot of other user-generated original high-quality content is posted; the final objective is to have the account officialiy deleted when the interested communities are fully-grown and there’s a sufficent amount of high-quality original content)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] djtech@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
  1. Sorry for the incovenice; but the community helped me and I will (if the bot is allowed by the admins to keep going) use a corrected version that uses reposts in order to appear as link to one community and have common comments and no feed problems. (Should appear with the same rarity as a normal post and never appear again)

  2. Yes, all titles and links are the same; at the moment the only topics built in the bot (as RSS feeds, HackerNews feeds and Lemmy communitys to post to) are Tech News, so the same news, talking of the same topics, published in similar communities, across different instances.

  3. As said before, the idea is to add average-quality content to different communities (especcialy smaller ones) and different instances (especially smaller ones) , in order to add content to those communities. This isn't a "forever" type of solution: slowly, with the increase of high-quality original posts, the bot will post less posts and will stop posting on major communities. When everything is ready to set off (feeds full of high-quality original posts from different communities), the bot will be removed forever, leaving place only to the community, real soul of the Fediverse.

[–] HolyFriedFish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Right, but my assumption - and maybe it's totally wrong - is that people probably follow multiple related communities, whether they're small or not, to get multiple sources of similar info. If that's the case, your bot effectively just spams their feeds. It sounds like your fix in your #1 may change that, which is nice.

Either way, I could see an argument for a ban being too strong a reaction. Especially because it's easy enough to block a bot as a user - I've blocked a few already.