this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2023
38 points (75.0% liked)

sh.itjust.works Main Community

7703 readers
11 users here now

Home of the sh.itjust.works instance.

Matrix

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was there, I saw the thread. @TheDude, did you? It was pretty strongly in favour. Do we really need to keep waiting around to see if an instance administrated by a guy who wants to declare "cis" a slur is going to turn out okay?

https://sh.itjust.works/post/216888 for context.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CookieJarObserver@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Sami@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] averagedrunk@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why is it when a place claims to be for free thought and expression it's always nonsense or harmful? Why does it have to be either fascist garbage, conspiracies that make absolutely no sense, or "artistic" pictures of children (photos or drawn)?

[–] Sami@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because no other place tolerates them so they flock to any that do. That's unfortunate reality of prioritizing 'free speech' over everything on a public internet space. You invite the baggage that comes with that.

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Absolute free speech shouldn't exist. If that were the case, we'd be giving a platform to the worst of the worst. The most vile, hateful speech should not be allowed to exist in a society that claims to want safety, respect for all, and prosperity.

The idea of absolute free speech requires the tolerance of hate, which allows the intolerant to drive out ideas that don't align with theirs. See here, the Paradox of Tolerance.

[–] Havoc8154@mander.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

Because reasonable moderation and common sense boundaries don't prevent free thought and expression for most people. So the main people that look for "free speech" communities are wild extremists or people seeking illegal material.