this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
43 points (82.1% liked)

Lemmy

12535 readers
3 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
nutomic@lemmy.ml
43
would it be simpler for people if we said "server" instead of "instance"? (programming.dev)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Die4Ever@programming.dev to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml
56 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

or maybe some other terminology would be better? lots of people get confused when you ask them to choose an instance, sometimes I think even the word "proxy", "host", or "hub" is simpler

the specific terms aren't my point, just a discussion to see if we can come up with a better name

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] iso@lemy.lol 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think "server" is basic and simple. I'm using that one.

[โ€“] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

I have a slight preference for server but I've been using both terms frequently and interchangeably. Whenever I start talking about this server and that instance, I often end up using the term several times in rapid succession. As all good writers know, widening ones vocabulary in such situations helps give the text a better flow. It's good to have multiple terms for any given concept to avoid excessive repetition when trying to explain things.