UK Politics

3103 readers

269 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom

GreatAlbatross

flamingos

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net

Coogan and Vorderman back Liberal Democrats' electoral reform pledge (www.bbc.co.uk)

submitted 1 year ago by i_am_not_a_robot to c/uk_politics

61 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Actor Steve Coogan and presenter Carol Vorderman have backed Liberal Democrat pledges to reform how the UK's general elections are run.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There was never a need for a referendum, Parliament has the absolute authority to change how its elections are run.

They should have insisted it was part of the coalition agreement, but didn't.

Like student loans, it was ultimately less important than being in power.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So the minority party, should have forced through a major constitutional change, which voters hadn’t voted for - in the name of democracy? And the idea of the referendum was bad.

Interesting take.

[–] hellothere@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Well when you put it that way....

The reality though is that both Labour and the LibDems had electoral reform in their manifestos - see Labour's 2010 manifesto here, page 92 - and as their votes combined were more than the Tories (approx 15 million, versus 10) you could argue that clearly that was the will of the people, and it should have at least been subject to a vote in the Commons.

Now that obviously didn't happen, and I'm not even saying it would be a successful option in negotiation, but what did happen was that the LibDems thought - and Clegg has said this himself - that having governmental stability was more important. Even if that meant passing a lot of pretty nasty shit.

[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

you could argue that clearly that was the will of the people, and it should have at least been subject to a vote in the Commons.

In my opinion The LD clearly thought it was the will of the people and persuaded the Tories to run the referendum to prove this and give the change political legitimacy