this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2023
107 points (93.5% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26286 readers
1660 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There is no animal called "cow".

Cow is a term for females of multiple species.

The animal that gives us milk is called cattle. Female cattle are cows. Male cattle are bulls.

I always thought cattle was a synonym for livestock, but it is a species of animal.

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Words mean how people use them. There is absolutely an animal called a cow, regardless of sex, and it's a synonym for cattle.

You are also correct that cow means female is many species.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] waz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Similarly, and also often misunderstood...

Peacock only refers to the males. A female is called a peahen.

[–] SgtAStrawberry@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That is such a logical thing, when you think about it.

My parents have several peacreatures...... a refer to them as shut the fuck up.... they are the donkeys of birds and should be exterminated.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Collectively they are an ungodly ruckus of peafowl.

[–] DokPsy@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly not sure which is worse. Peafowl or guinea fowl

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh yeah! That's a good one too!

[–] itsprobablyfine 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Wait. The singular of cattle is cattle? I think that's the part that confuses me. Or is there no singular and you must use cow/bull? Either way I've never really thought about it and now I can't not

[–] xantoxis@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No, the person you're replying to is just wrong. The common name for that animal is cow, and in common usage it can refer to both sexes. Cattle is the plural.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Actually, your already familiar with this: Moose.

One Moose. Two Moose. Male is a bull. Female is a cow. 🤯

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Cattle" is a mass noun. You have a lot of cattle.

If you want to state a number of them, you have seventy-two head of cattle. "Head" is a counter; compare "sheets of paper", "bales of hay", or "hands of poker".

You wouldn't say you have fifty hay, or that you played five pokers. And "papers" (count noun) are written works, whereas "paper" (mass noun) or "sheets of paper" (mass noun with counter) is what the works are written on.

If you're in the cattle business, you absolutely do care about their age, sex, and reproductive status. So you might have one calf and six cows; or three steers; or two heifers, a yearling calf, and a bull.

If you really need to refer to one bovine without talking about its age, sex, or reproductive status ... you have one head of cattle, or you have a cattlebeast.

Yep, that's a thing.

[–] oNevion@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure if your mind is blown because you also didn't know that, or you don't understand what I'm saying.

I could clarify if you'd like, but you'll have to let me know what you mean by Wut.

[–] Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What you've said is technically correct (the best kind of correct). But the word cattle is also used to refer to other similar animals such as Yak, Bison, Buffalo.

Merriam-Webster defines cattle as

: domesticated quadrupeds held as property or raised for use
specifically : bovine animals on a farm or ranch

Cambridge defines it as:

a group of animals that includes cows, buffalo, and bison, that are often kept for their milk or meat

And Oxford as:

cows and bulls that are kept as farm animals for their milk or meat

Wikipedia is more specific and defines it as:

Cattle or oxen (Bos taurus) are large, domesticated, bovid ungulates. They are prominent modern members of the subfamily Bovinae and the most widespread species of the genus Bos.

Not disputing your fact at all, just clarifying that words often have multiple meanings and meanings also change over time according to popular usage, so saying cattle means livestock isn't necessarily wrong, it's just not as precise as the technical definition. And the more people that use it that way the more correct it becomes. As I dove deeper into the topic, I'm seeing evidence that suggests that Cattle is also an American term that means Livestock, but is marked as archaic. Which honestly makes sense as the word's etymology is the following according to Merriam-Webster:

Middle English catel, cadel "property (whether real or personal), goods, treasure, livestock, (in plural cateles) possessions," borrowed from Anglo-French katil "property, goods, wealth," borrowed from medieval French (dialects of Picardy and French Flanders) catel, going back to Medieval Latin capitāle "movable property, riches," (in Anglo-Saxon law texts) "head of cattle," noun derivative from neuter of capitālis "of the head, chief, principal"

Anyway, good fact nonetheless.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. I often heard cattle used in that way, so that's why I thought it. So, no it's not wrong, but it was pretty wild to learn that it wasn't completely correct.

[–] Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What's wild to me is that humans decided to name a whole-ass species "Property".

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's the other way around.

Like you might call a bunch of mindless followers "sheep". We didn't name the animal after those people, we started using the word that way because it reminded us of the animal.

[–] Skyhighatrist@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The etymology suggests that originally we just called livestock cattle (i.e. these are My animals, my property), and the name was so ubiquitous that when it came time to give the specific species a name, it stuck.

[–] Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I just assumed otherwise, because that's pretty funny if it's true.

[–] oNevion@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Definitely meant as in I had no idea either and you helped me learn something today ☺️