this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
1442 points (94.8% liked)

Memes

45731 readers
1504 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The comparison to hunger makes it clear to me. It isn't being compared to the state of having an empty stomach.

[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, I see, you're fucking brain dead. Now this whole conversation makes sense. You literally cannot admit you are clearly wrong. Please go touch grass, you are pathetic.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll do it after I eat lunch because of the feeling of hunger, not the state of having an empty stomach.

[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In short, I am proposing that dissonance, that is, the existence of nonfitting relations among cognitions, is a motivating factor in it's own right.

Need that one more time? Here ya go

In short, I am proposing that dissonance, that is, the existence of nonfitting relations among cognitions, is a motivating factor in it's own right.

Maybe if you read it ONE MORE TIME it will click for you

In short, I am proposing that dissonance, that is, the existence of nonfitting relations among cognitions, is a motivating factor in it's own right.

Cognitive dissonance is the existence of nonfitting relations among cognition, not the feeling of discomfort arising from that. It is what you are suffering from right now. You have the evidence laid clearly in front of you, but you cherry pick one TINY tidbit and interpret it incorrectly so as to suit your needs. You KNOW you are wrong, and you are arguing in bad faith.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm arguing in bad faith? You told me to go back to grade school.

[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, because you clearly need it. You dont even know what bad faith is. Bad faith arguing is when you aren't actually working towards the resolution of the argument, but instead just making frivolous contradictions that you yourself probably dont even believe in, just to try and keep the other side from making a point. Insulting you is not bad faith. So, yeah, go back to school and actually pay attention this time.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insulting you is not bad faith.

[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it literally isn't. An insult is not mutually exclusive to a good faith argument, but you wouldn't know that because you clearly dont understand the concept. Go look up what bad faith argumentation is.