this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
130 points (95.8% liked)

Games

32674 readers
868 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Has anyone else noticed that Wikis for most games just aren't as complete anymore?

I'm the one helping to fill in stuff these days when I swear most games had pretty fully Wiki pages within a week of release. Have most of these just moved to actual Gaming article websites? They sure as hell haven't gone to Gamefaqs lol.

I've recently played Diablo 4, Remnant 2, 30XX, Armored Core 6, and just started Have a Nice Death... and I've had to help with additions on nearly every free Wiki... Never used to have to do this...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sebinspace@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because monopoly.

Shit, Mojang used to maintain their own wiki for Minecraft, but it was dropped and migrated to Fandom and now none of us can have nice things.

[–] ryapric@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was about to reply and say "nuh uh, the Minecraft wiki isn't a Fandom one", but jesus you're right.

[–] bobbysq@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

It used to be independent until Curse started Gamepedia and then got bought by Wikia.

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How is it a monopoly when mediawiki is FOSS? Lots of fan wikis use that instead.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Monopolies aren't defined by the availability of alternatives. It's based on the market share captured by a single entity. We'd need to see statistics to determine if it's a total monopoly, but I'm not aware of many other hosting platforms for game wikis. Maybe fextralife?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fextralife is utter shit. Always giving you the most unrelated information in the longest amount of time all while being forced to watch a stream you don't care about.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 year ago

I use an adblocker to remove their stupid stream embed

[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah I think hosting is the thing that they've captured, far more than the notion of a domain-specific wiki. Of course, there's nothing stopping an aspiring wiki admin from hosting on a platform that isn't targeted at game wikis.