this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
355 points (97.6% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2351 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Supposed aliens landed in Mexico’s Congress but there were no saucer-shaped UFOs hovering over the historic building or bright green invaders like those seen in Hollywood films.

The specter of little green men visited Mexico City as lawmakers heard testimony Tuesday from individuals suggesting the possibility that extraterrestrials might exist. The researchers hailed from Mexico, the United States, Japan and Brazil.

The session, unprecedented in the Mexican Congress, took place two months after a similar one before the U.S. Congress in which a former U.S. Air Force intelligence officer claimed his country has probably been aware of “non-human” activity since the 1930s.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

What’s your scientific peer reviewed explanation for the videos released by the Pentagon then, champ?

Pulitzer Prize winning journalists who broke the TicTac video to the NY Times are lying I guess?

Obama must have been smoking something when he said things fly in our skies and we don’t know what they are?

None of this is worth any sort of investigation?

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The person making the claim is the one that has the burden of proof, Champ.

The only thing you've proven is your own gullibility.

[–] Thrillhouse@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’m not claiming anything? I’m saying UAP deserve further investigation due to the fact that the Pentagon has released video on the subject, we’ve shot objects down without explanation as to what they were, and the former President of the US has spoken on this topic.

You’re trying to railroad any discussion of this for… reasons? Is not worth investigating things we don’t know about anymore?

[–] Redtitwhore@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Some people just don't want to risk looking like a fool and want to feel superior but it's worth investigating for the reasons you mentioned.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)