this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
959 points (88.7% liked)

Political Memes

5428 readers
2429 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What exactly are you arguing?

Are you suggesting communist societies don't have heat, hospitals and transport?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting there aren't green methods to achieve those?

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That list in particular , yes they can be covered by renewables

Im am of the belief that we cant maintain our current lavish lives on renewables alone though.

Personally I think scaling back mixed with renewables is the answer. Less priority for the meat industry (of which I am a partaker), more work from home, more low emmision public transport.

There is no one silver bullet in the fight against the climate change. It will take an amalgamation of methods.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree with all of these things, but I find it doubtful that the industry, if left to the whims of its industry leaders, will ever take the plunge of their own accord, because they're making too much money producing fossil fuels. And that income includes massive subsidies, eclipsing any efforts towards renewables, meaning the state is also in collusion.

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh absolutely. No disagreements here.

The quickest path to mitigating the effects of climate catastrophe is to reform out economic and therefore political system. Easier said than done though

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, I wouldn't say it's a simple fix. But the broad strokes are easily described: introduce democracy to our economy. True democracy, from the people, to the people. Let us dictate how the market functions and what it produces

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think you clearly are misinterpreting my argument.

Capitalism produces MORE emissions. That's all im saying. I never said Communism produces zero emmisions.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions

Scroll down to the breakdown by year by country. None of the communist inclusive countries and continents even make the list.

South America, famous for its communist and socialist revolutions is barely a blip on that graph, as a whole continent.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's because they're poor as fuck. What do you think you're sharing, here?

Venezuela's entire government is funded by oil exports, making them, as a state a global sponsor of climate change.

People consume oil and the economic system they live in has nothing to do with that.

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

And why do you think those countries are poor as fuck?

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah I see. You don't like the evidence so you hand wave. Thats enough talking to you.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Appreciate you stopping but it's more than you don't even understand the data you're sharing