Linux

48429 readers

1157 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

Linux advocacy discussion (mastodon) (mastodon.social)

submitted 1 year ago by GravelPieceOfSword@lemmy.ca to c/linux@lemmy.ml

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Two main points:

no one unified distro to keep things simple (thread OP)

people don't care. Someone else needs to advocate, sell, migrate, and support (medium term) Linux (whichever distro they want) for the intermediate term (few months at least) - thread response).

I think a lot of the 97% desktop market share is like this, instead of the hands on 2-3%.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TheRedSpade@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Android was Open Source once until Google decided to mainstream it.

Android is still open source. Proprietary stuff gets added by the time it gets to the consumer, but the base is open.

[–] gammarays@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's open-source merely to comply with the GPL license of the kernel, but the fact is that an Android image built only from open source components will be extremely crippled or, depending on your point of view, basically useless. Such an image will not even boot on the majority of devices ; you'll need those sweet proprietary driver blobs if you want your phone to do anything, and a bunch more closed source binaries in order to use Play services.

[–] RagingToad@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not sure exactly how many blobs I need to install Linux on my pc. I know there's proprietary stuff for my Nvidia card (optional) and possibly NIC, but most hardware is supported by the kernel these days?

Also, the play store. That's my biggest issue with Android. Everything depends on the store.

[–] naeap@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Did you try Aurora store (interface to Google play store, trying to hide your installs) or the more Linux like repository manager f-droid?

[–] Jumuta@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Linux has a similar issue though

[–] mutter9355@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Don't know why this is downvoted. Even distros like Debian, that are 100% FOSS otherwise, will (often) load some proprietary firmware because otherwise it would barely be functional on any modern computer.

[–] RagingToad@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago

I was afraid someone was going to point out that AOSP exists, but it's not very useful.

The Android that everyone uses and talks about is very closed, because everything depends on the playstore.