this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
419 points (95.1% liked)

RPGMemes

10342 readers
4 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
419
When your friends have money. (comicpress.socksandpuppets.com)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ahdok@ttrpg.network to c/rpgmemes@ttrpg.network
 

This comic is part of an ongoing story that might make more sense with full context.

First comic in this story
Previous comic in this story
Next comic in this story

Please be advised that if you use the connect app, it doesn't always correctly parse links to lemmy posts. If they're not working for you, you can follow the whole plotline on my site. (These comics are in reverse chronological order, so start at the end and work backwards.)

Since I know people will ask: Proficiency 4, Wisdom 5, Observant, Sentinel Shield.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ahdok@ttrpg.network 35 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I'm choosing to believe the comedic irony is deliberate here.

[–] ahdok@ttrpg.network 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Technically the comic should read "Konsi's passive perception is normally 29" - she doesn't have the shield on her here, so it's only 24... but her reputation with the party is one that is commensurate with the 29, that's the level they're used to her operating at.

[–] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, but how does she have a 29 Perception?

[–] ahdok@ttrpg.network 6 points 1 year ago

It's a power that comes from misinterpreting too many romantic advances. Part of the anti-bard prestige class.

[–] nootstorm@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ahdok@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're going to have to elaborate on that question.

[–] nootstorm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an old Zoolander reference - there's a whole bit where the big conspiracy is explained to the title character, and he repeats the question "why male models?" even though it's just been explained why in excruciating detail.

...I should probably use less obscure references, but it seemed like a good idea at the time.

[–] ahdok@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a film I should have watched.

[–] nootstorm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

The first one's good fun, in a rather daft way, I hear the sequel is not so great tho

[–] SnipingNinja@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

I missed it too but tbf I'm avoiding looking at the link preview that appears just below the description text to avoid comic spoilers