this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2023
192 points (97.1% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3494 readers
2 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Zetta@mander.xyz 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Did anyone get punished?

Edit. Did anyone besides the original terrorist get punished?

[–] SpicyPeaSoup@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lolno. The prime minister at the time who made the decision to call the Egyptians in for no valid reason (and refused help from France, the UK, and US) allegedly wanted to resign, because it turns out the Egyptian commandos were only interested in getting the terrorists and actually gave zero shits about saving lives.

Anyway, the suckups in government ended up convincing him to stay in power.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Was there any claimed justification at all for refusing help from France, the UK, and US, or did the prime minister clam up real tight after the fiasco?

[–] SpicyPeaSoup@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

Officially? No justification that makes sense.

In reality, Malta in the 80s was trying to balance things between the west and other countries like China, Libya, and the kind of countries where you're not allowed to criticise the government.

The government was EXTREMELY corrupt (still is, just less so now), so it would have probably been easier for local politicians to arrange side deals with similarly corrupt countries.