this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
66 points (100.0% liked)

Labour

7737 readers
21 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Michael Athokhamien Omnibus Imoudu, generally known as Pa Imoudu, was a labour union leader and activist. He encouraged workers in both the private and public sectors to form unions. During the colonial era, he used strike actions to seek better working conditions for Nigerian workers, as well as make the British change obnoxious laws that affected workers.

He later joined the National Council of Nigeria and the Cameroons (NCNC) and was one of the party’s delegates to London in protest of the 1946 Richards Constitution.

Born September 7, 1902, in Ukpafikan Quarters, Oke Ora near Sabongida Ora in Edo State, Imoudu attended Government School, Ora. At the death of his father, he accompanied his uncle to Sapele, later to Onitsha and finally to Agbor, where he completed his primary school education.

After his primary education, Imoudu moved to Lagos and worked with the Posts and Telegraphs Department as a linesman before moving to the Nigeria Railways.

While with the Railways, Imoudu became actively involved in the Railway Workers Union (RWU) and in 1939; he became president of the union. In the same year, the union was registered under the Trade Union Ordinance, which allowed it to seek collective bargaining with their employers. With Imoudu as head, the union renewed its demand for higher wages, de-casualization and improved working conditions.

Imoudu had constant clashes with European managers because of the preferential treatment given to European officials. Between 1941 and 1943, Imoudu was queried many times and dismissed in January 1943.

With the formation of the African Civil Servants Technical Workers Union in 1941 and Imoudu being the Vice President, he used the organisation to agitate for war bonus — Cost Of Living Allowance (COLA) — to cushion the effects of inflation caused by World War II (WW II). The government listened and made some COLA concession in 1942 under the leadership of Bernard Bourdillon.

In 1943, Imoudu was dismissed and detained, but his detention was later changed to restriction of movement. He was released on May 20, 1945, after the end of WW II.

Imoudu was released from prison by the government in 1945, presumably as a means to de-escalate labor tensions. A large rally was held to welcome him back to Lagos, however, and, on the 21st and 22nd of June 1945, Imoudu led a radical wing of the RWU to organize a general strike that became a historically important in Nigeria.

In 1946, Imoudu identified with NCNC and was nominated to its executive council.

From 1947 to 1958, he led different trade unions, including the All Nigeria Trade Union Federation, which enjoyed initial success, incorporating 45 out of the 57 registered unions at the time.

Pa Imoudu did all this with no intention of enriching himself, but to improve the nation and create a better working environment for workers. He could not even build a house or buy a car for himself, despite his dealings with the government and captains of industry. He was focused on making Nigeria a better country than milking the people.

During the Second Republic, he joined the People’s Redemption Party (PRP) as its deputy National President.

In pursuit of his welfare ideologies, he awarded scholarships to youths from different backgrounds to study in the USSR, China, and East Germany.

In 1982, however, the late Chief Obafemi Awolowo built a house and bought a car for him as gifts for his 80th birthday, while a labour institute, Michael Imoudu National Institute for Labour Studies (MINILS), was established and named after him in 1986. He died on June 22, 2005.

Megathreads and spaces to hang out:

reminders:

  • 💚 You nerds can join specific comms to see posts about all sorts of topics
  • 💙 Hexbear’s algorithm prioritizes comments over upbears
  • 💜 Sorting by new you nerd
  • 🌈 If you ever want to make your own megathread, you can reserve a spot here nerd
  • 🐶 Join the unofficial Hexbear-adjacent Mastodon instance toots.matapacos.dog

Links To Resources (Aid and Theory):

Aid:

Theory:

now all fediverse discussion will be considered a current struggle session discussion and all comment about it are subject to be removed and even banning from the comm.

have all of you a good day/night meow-coffee

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

reading benjamin's arcades project (currently at convolut D) has made me become obsessed with the concept of eternal recurrence (of the new/the same)

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

he quotes a long passage from blanqui's 'eternity via the stars,' where the french revolutionary creates this hellish vision of an infinite number of universes that are all eternally repeating, never allowing for anything new. and i'm just sitting her like, wow - this is just like our postmodernist culture!

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The entire universe is composed of astral systems. To create them, nature has only a hundred simple bodies at its disposal. Despite the great advantage it derives from these resources, and the innumerable combinations that these resources afford its fecundity, the result is necessarily a finite number, like that of the elements themselves; and in order to fill its expanse, nature must repeat to infinity each of its original combinations or types. So each heavenly body, whatever it might be, exists in infinite number in time and space, not only in one of its aspects but as it is at each second of its existence, from birth to death. … The earth is one of these heavenly bodies. Every human being is thus eternal at every second of his or her existence. What I write at this moment in a cell of the Fort du Taureau I have written and shall write throughout all eternity – at a table, with a pen, clothed as I am now, in circumstances like these. And thus it is for everyone. … The number of our doubles is infinite in time and space. One cannot in good conscience demand anything more. These doubles exist in flesh and bone – indeed, in trousers and jacket, in crinoline and chignon. They are by no means phantoms; they are the present eternalized. Here, nonetheless, lies a great drawback: there is no progress. … What we call “progress” is confined to each particular world, and vanishes with it. Always and everywhere in the terrestrial arena, the same drama, the same setting, on the same narrow stage – a noisy humanity infatuated with its own grandeur, believing itself to be the universe and living in its prison as though in some immense realm, only to founder at an early date along with its globe, which has borne with deepest disdain the burden of human arrogance. The same monotony, the same immobility, on other heavenly bodies. The universe repeats itself endlessly and paws the ground in place. In infinity, eternity performs – imperturbably – the same routines.

— Blanqui, 1873

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

some scattered thoughs:

an infinity expanding universe, but the 'resources' its made of, and their possible combinations, are by necessity limitited = the phantasmagoria of commodities - eternally recreating the same in the name of the new. capitalism and the necessity of eternal expansion, eternal progress

endless worlds, but no progress = postmodernism and its favoring of microstories over larger narratives (but obfuscating capitalist hegemony)

endless worlds, no progress = rejection of the narrative of progress ('quoting blanqui, "Until now, the past has, for us, meant barbarism, whereas the future has signified progress, science, happiness, illusion!)

edit: sorry not drunk, just trying to write from my phone

[–] Poogona@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

To make you feel less crazy, it's something that literature has pontificated about for a really long time. A core element of many great extended narratives is that recurrence.

The way I think about it to escape that feeling of being trapped is to focus on it as a fallacy. We humans love patterns, of course, and we "see' them everywhere. But if we were good at nailing down patterns in their totality, we'd have mapped the fractal of reality by now. It helps me in a sort of stargazing way to remember that sometimes one pattern is a minor bit of fuzz in a larger one, and that larger pattern is part of an even weirder and more indistinct one, and so on.

Vague philosophizing nonsense but it helped me dispel that feeling of being stuck in a stale recurrence of bipolar ups and downs that seemed like it could never escape the confines of our capitalist "now."

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thanks! i have to admit, it's not a concept i'm very familiar with. i thought benjamin's project, in terms of the temporal, was primarily about dispelling the illusion of 'the new.' but i guess maybe the flip side of that is the eternal recurrence - the idea that there really can't be anything outside of the capitalist 'now' (?)- which he also deems to be a product of false consciousness.

elsewhere, he wrote something about blanqui falling victim to the same system that he opposed, but that the criticism itself, while based on a false premise, dispels the illusion of capitalisms 'eternalness' by making it so gruesome

"Blanqui yields to bourgeois society. But he’s brought to his knees with such force that the throne begins to totter."

— Benjamin, D5a, 2

sorry for rambling, lol. it just helps me work through what i'm reading

[–] Poogona@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago

Nice quote, even if the idea of yielding so hard you shake the floor sounds a little convenient to me lol. Still a pretty thought.

I get it though, makes me miss being in school when at least we were all reading the same thing, even if we all made sure to hate whatever we were reading

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The possible combinations are limited, but to actually reach the limits would take much, much longer than the projected lifespan of the universe.

Also, "multiverse" stuff is bad science fiction. When it's done well it can lead to interesting stories but most writers just use it to skeeve out of upsetting the status quo.

Either way, the answer is absurdism. Or Buhhdism, i guess.

Also entropy increases in all systems observed to date so nothing is actually repeating on a macroscale as the universe cools towards heat death.

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

oh yeah, i'm not really that interested in the multiverse stuff as science, i just thought it was neat to see it presented as an analogy for capitalism (and by a writer in 1870, no less)

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cool posts. I've always wanted to read the arcade project, but then I remember it's 1000 pages. What are some of the best chapters you've read so far?

Also, you may enjoy this: https://stasisjournal.net/index.php/journal/article/download/19/22/ it's ilyenkovs essay on cosmology

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

thank you, i'll definitely give that a read!

i'm only about a 120 pages in, but the chapter i just finished, D) Boredom, Eternal Return, might be my favorite so far. they've all been super interesting though! i put off reading for so long due to its size, but it's really not that bad. like yeah, you'll probably be reading it over several months, but the way it's organized (by 'convolutes,' mostly consisting of quotes) makes it easy to pick up and put away.

also, probably a crazy comparison, but to me the montage effect - the way the quotes are organized - reminds me of my experience with reading house of leaves. like, it feels bigger on the inside than the outside. benjamin has send me down on so many weird sidetracks already, from the arcade to the catacombs of paris, to vaudeville acts, world exhibitions, the history of hoop skirts etc.

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Ilyenkov text is fun, and while maybe just tangentially related to what you are talking about, it is a far more hopeful text than that quote from Blanqui (which makes sense seeing as it was written while he was in prison) or the postmodern eternal recurrence.

Have you read any of Baudrillard?

Cool, I may read that chapter tomorrow! I have the absolutely massive pdf of the book, which my pc refuses to do OCR on lol. Benjamin was a really well read guy, and I've really enjoyed all of what I've read from him, even if it is just a few essays.

[–] Sasuke@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

no, i've only read a few excerpts from baudrillard's simulacra in uni. he's on my very long list of authors i should read (which sometimes almost gets a little overwhelming, lmao). do you have any suggestions on where to begin with him?

and good luck, i hope you enjoy it! btw there's also two short (almost identical) essays by benjamin at the beginning of the arcades project which might be worth reading first

[–] Parsani@hexbear.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

First chapter of Simulacra and Simulation, and honestly, his travelog, America is great if a little dated at times. It's an easier in than Symbolic Exchange and Death, for example.

Thanks for the tip!