this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
216 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59588 readers
3576 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That headline needs a massive IF statement

IF it passed in its current state, which is highly doubtful.

The govt has already U-turned on breaking encryption. Making everyone share their biometric data to prove age is a privacy nightmare, and probably breaks existing laws

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If it passed as is, hosting providers would just add a check box to allow or block access from UK IP addresses. Overnight, most of the Internet would stop working for UK residents.

[–] hellequin67 13 points 1 year ago

Is a distinct possibility.

Even now I come across US sites which don't work because they don't want to have the whole GDPR compliance for EU members, which is usually overcome by a simple VPN to Canada/USA.

Funny thing about this is that the very people this is supposed to protect are probably far more tech savvy than the dinosaurs writing the legislation.

Torrent sites are blocked in UK by most isps , does it stop torrenting? No. And this wont work either it will just restrict the internet for the majority to "protect" the minority.

[–] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Except, if I understand correctly they haven't u-turned. They aren't removing the language re encryption, just acknowledging that it isn't enforceable. Yet.