this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2023
1377 points (87.2% liked)

Memes

45737 readers
662 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The rent that pays the mortgage he couldn't afford to pay. All rent is is paying someone else's mortgage.

[–] aikixd@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let's say the mortgage is payed. Then the rent pays whatever the landlord decides to do with that money. Like literally any other transaction.

[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Owning multiple homes for profit is a large part of the current crisis. People shouldn't be able to withhold homes and hold them ransom.

[–] aikixd@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree, but limiting rights is not a good way to approach the issue. Raising taxation on 2+ properties is much better. And perhaps there are even better approaches, but an not an economist.

[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No one has a right to own multiple properties

[–] aikixd@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What about multiple of anything? How about 2 cars? After all, each car takes limited parking space and adds to traffic problems. How about eating more calories than one needs to live? Should we review all existing items that one can buy?

[–] TheDoctorDonna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

One problem at time. Using the overwhelming tactic is just that, a tactic. Just because there are other issues we face, doesn't mean we shouldn't fight this battle. But at the end of the day the answer is yes- we should review all existing items that one can buy. Have you seen the state of the environment lately?