this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
1104 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45760 readers
1282 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Your devices recording you is something that doesn't happen.

That requires a lot of bandwidth, or a lot of battery and a little bandwidth. There's no evidence of that happening.

Honestly, the creepier thing is that they don't have to to get creepily accurate ads.

Geolocation data means they know who you spend time with. They also know their search history. They know your interests. They can look at what people who seem similar to you search for.

Plus, they serve you a lot of ads so they can afford to have a lot of misses.

[–] thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Your devices recording you is something that doesn't happen.

There's no evidence of that happening.

What's your basis for this claim? I mean that might be the case, but is there some reason you're able to have so much certainty?

I understand the "bandwidth" argument, and the "they don't even need that" argument (I make a similar case in a comment to another reply), but neither of those support the idea that it can't be happening.

Getting around the bandwidth problem isn't that crazy: Low bitrate encodings (cause the audio doesn't need to be human-comprehensible) and edge compute (i.e. doing some work on the device before sending anything) could mitigate this significantly, so it's hardly impossible.

I think we mostly agree, I just wouldn't apply that degree of certainty. But if you're really confident that it's definitely not happening because it's definitely not possible, maybe you know something I don't?

[–] baropithecus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Personal story time. A few years back, I texted (through Whatsapp) a colleague for a few minutes about a friend taking up welding as a supplementary source of income, and immediately (within the day) received a targeted ad in the Duolingo app for... welding torches. Important facts, I don't weld, I've never done any welding and I don't know anything about welding. How this bit of info got from whatsapp to whomever was providing interstitial ads in the duolingo app, I have no idea. My best guess is still that google's keyboard app is logging every single keystroke I type and aggregating it in a database somewhere. I can't fathom how that shit isn't extremely illegal.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Instead of recording and sending to servers, the tracker could use some speech to text locally amd send transcription to the servers too

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Right - that would require enough battery and processing power to make it obvious that it's doing something like that.

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think so. Text to speech and speech to text engines are availiable locally without much power i guess. Also there could be error prone algorithm which records low quality audio for sake of performance and extended battery which is still enough. Also its not far off from recording and sending low quality audio to servers as intermet speeds are much faster than an audio stream

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

They are available locally yes, but not without much power and processing.

So much power and processing usage, you would notice.