this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2023
560 points (94.4% liked)

Technology

59345 readers
6347 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
L4s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
560
Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists (www.kcl.ac.uk)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
118 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Driverless cars worse at detecting children and darker-skinned pedestrians say scientists::Researchers call for tighter regulations following major age and race-based discrepancies in AI autonomous systems.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That seems like the car is relying way too much on video to detect surroundings...

[–] Haquer@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sooo.... like the Tesla?

[–] Dave@lemmy.nz 2 points 1 year ago

Haha yes, but from the article I got the impression it was across all tested brands. Tesla is being called out at the moment for not having the appropriate hardware that other brands are using (e.g. LIDAR).