this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
720 points (95.3% liked)

Programmer Humor

19623 readers
2 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] docAvid@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I agree with your logic, so far as it goes. However, there are, currently, just over eight billion humans in existence. If my quick, over-tired math is correct, that means only 34 people have to say no, until we run out of people to tie to the tracks. Assuming, at that point, the system collapses and nobody dies, I'd guess 34 people would refuse - might be the better choice.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Would you trust the entirety of human existence to be decided by 34 people? In my experience from watching reality TV, the last one always screws the rest over for their own benefit.

Imagine being the last one. You could singlehandedly wipe out half the global population. This would normally be a bad thing, and it is, but it would also make every surviver twice as rich, solve food scarcity and halve the pollution, perhaps even saving humanity from itself.

If that's not enough, think about everyone now having double the amount of kittens and half the traffic on the roads.

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Society and the economy are not a zero sum game. Killing half the population wouldn't make the survivors twice as rich. It would send society into chaos which would make the remaining people's lives far worse.

[–] docAvid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure reality TV is a good basis, it's very manipulated and set up for drama. I have a lot more faith in humanity in general than I do in reality TV stars. But you still have a good point, it's definitely not a sure thing.

[–] blackstampede@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh yeah. I was assuming an infinite series (somehow). Also, odds are good that out of 34 people, one of them would misunderstand the rules or be crazy enough to do it anyway for various reasons. I'd probably still do it.

[–] docAvid@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

You weren't wrong, the meme implies an infinite series, and I might be cheating to apply real-world constraints to an absurd hypothetical.

[–] Default_Defect@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After we run out of people, they start adding cats & dogs.

[–] docAvid@midwest.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yikes! Pull the lever now!