this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2023
52 points (74.5% liked)

Anarchism

1381 readers
45 users here now

Discuss anarchist praxis and philosophy. Don't take yourselves too seriously.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Breaking down walls, tearing down barriers and abolishing borders.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] tty84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Once again, you confuse authority with discipline. What is ruled by consensus don't need to be enforced by authority.

[–] glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And when did this thing called consensus ever happened in the past 10000 years?

[–] tty84@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Haha ! good question, probably never happened...

That's precisely the nature of progress: to create what doesn't yet exist.

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

But, but Somalia!

[–] Gxost@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was leading a work group designing a new software. I tried to reach consensus, so everybody in the group would be satisfied with our decisions. But it didn't work. Everybody was arguing even on simple questions and didn't listen to arguments of others. Votings didn't help too, because the minority was rising the same questions again and again, trying to convince others to join them and then re-vote. And nobody was satisfied. We were wasting time. But when I said that now I only listen to others and make decisions on my own, everybody was ok with that. Our meetings became productive. So, I don't believe consensus is possible.

[–] xachugesh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Consensus is really a function of group size.

I was in a group, there were 8 members we went back an forth for months to try come to decisions, it was not a great time and nothing was achieved.

Consensus is probably possible in groups of around 4-5