this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
911 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59345 readers
5951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

College professors are going back to paper exams and handwritten essays to fight students using ChatGPT::The growing number of students using the AI program ChatGPT as a shortcut in their coursework has led some college professors to reconsider their lesson plans for the upcoming fall semester.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkiDude@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If you're going to take a class to learn how to do X, but never actually learn how to do X because you're letting a machine do all the work, why even take the class?

In the real world, even if you're using all the newest, cutting edge stuff, you still need to understand the concepts behind what you're doing. You still have to know what to put into the tool and that what you get out is something that works.

If the tool, AI, whatever, is smart enough to accomplish the task without you actually knowing anything, what the hell are you useful for?

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why even take the class?

To have a piece of paper to get a job.

For CS this is nothing new we have been dealing with graduates who can't program, and self-taught geniuses, since before the AI boom so paper credentials just aren't as important.

[–] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You don't need a piece of paper to get a decent job. People go to college to get into fields they personally care about. If all you care about is money, go work sales.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Companies love paper certificates because that means they can outsource judging applicant qualifications. How bad that is differs from company to company and field to field.

I mean if you're a small non-IT company, say a machine shop, and you're looking for a devops and you have no IT department and noone understands anything about what that person is going to do but "is going to run our website and sales platform"... what else are you going to rely on but paper certificates? Hire a consultancy?

Most companies don't actually require degrees to get decent paying work. Even s lot of IT work is hired more by documented experience than having a degree. Having a degree alone simply doesn't cut it in that field; you have to actually prove you can do actual things which a degree can't really do anymore. Degrees are for academic fields.

Source: Went to college, then switched to sales which required no outside education, learned and earned a lot more.

[–] prosp3kt@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But that's actually most of the works we have nowadays. IA is replacing repetitive works such as magazine writers or script writers

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Writers are repetitive work????

[–] prosp3kt@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Well, it seems they will be replaced, at least certain writers. https://www.npr.org/2023/05/20/1177366800/striking-movie-and-tv-writers-worry-that-they-will-be-replaced-by-ai Also, callcenters https://www.bbc.com/news/business-65906521 And junior programmers. The problem here it's not my opinion, those already happened so its not debatable.

[–] barsoap@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

And junior programmers

...no. Juniors are hard enough to mentor to write sensible code in the first place adding AI to that is only making things worse.

The long-term impacts on AI past what's already happening (and having an actual positive impact on the products and companies, that is, discount that Hollywood scriptwriting stuff) will be in industrial automation and logistics/transportation. Production lines that can QC on their own as well as a whole army of truck and taxi drivers. AI systems will augment fields such as medicine, but not replace actual doctors. Think providing alternative diagnosis possibilities and recommending suitable tests to be sure kind of stuff, combatting routine tunnel vision by, precisely, being less adaptive than human doctors.

Any platform that does that is going to collapse. Not enough people will watch AI generated garbage for it to be viable, and those that don't will simply split off the internet and entertainment, shrinking and splitting the economy.

[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I understand that they'll be replaced, or at least the producers want thant, but I don't think that's because of repetitive work, more like they need a lot of them.