this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
798 points (74.6% liked)

Memes

45585 readers
1710 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

look i dont got much money in the bank but people need to start donating to foss creators cause it's getting dumb, musescore sold out to ultimate guitar and theyre going to shit cause guess what? no one gave money. the linux distro im using is ome of the biggest jn the world and it barely scrapes 1000 usd a month. when i get a job i'll start giving money but people seriously need to chip in, im not mad at sync at all i get it

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

FOSS = principled free software without obligation because the labor was "donated."

That's what I'm learning on lemmy. It's blowing my mind.

Edit: exiting to make sure I'm understood. I get FOSS. I understand it's role. What I'm learning is there is a while corner of the internet determined not to spend money on software.

And feeling significant moral outrage if someone else does. It's bizarre. I've seen religious people less zealous.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

also yeah it stands for free open source software and FLOSS means it's licensed in a way which prevents it from being closed off later on

[–] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm fairness, FOSS development is not as expensive. You usually are basing your work on previous libraries. Everyone builds off each other so nobody has to do it alone. That's FOSS

[–] APassenger@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I have nothing against FOSS. Good things have been done.

I have an issue with people acting like if it isn't FOSS it is morally wrong. You may not have done this, but it's a vibe I've seen more than once here.

That and a notion that the app should be free. That's fine, but if people are "saving money" I hope it goes to the servers or lemmy devs.

In short: an undercurrent to some FOSS posts has seemed to be entitlement, not just a desire to see FOSS thrive.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

theres no obligation but if they dont get paid theyve no obligation to help us, it's mutually benefitial

[–] cufta22@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

talkimg about foss things

[–] Burb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sorry but how is musescore going to shit? The online subscription is totally separate from the open source app which has had some major development lately and looks and functions amazing.

That being said I agree with your sentiment, the funding for these projects needs to be more robust.

[–] Neve8028@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Tantacrul is in charge of the UI/UX design now and his involvement is easily one of the best things to happen to musescore imo. It's actually super competitive to other scoring software now. Not that musescore was bad before, it was just super janky with some features. He said he's working on a redesign for audacity too which should be interesting.

[–] Burb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The change from 3x to 4x was huge. It really looks professional now and is waaay less cludgey then before. I have been using it since the 2x days and hoo boy it's so much better now.

The audacity redesign sounds really cool! That's another program which has lasted the test of time and I would be interested to see how they modify the interface.

[–] jackpot@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

i fear musehub will answer what i mean soon enough