Apple

17525 readers

69 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world

158

Apple Explains Why It Won’t Make iPhones With Replaceable Batteries (www.inverse.com)

submitted 1 year ago by doctorcherry@lemmy.ml to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Frankly though, I wish the term used was “water resistance” and not “waterproof”. That semantic annoys me.

Better is to use an ingress protection code, which provides standardized ratings for exactly how dust and water resistant a device is. Apple does use IP codes and rates the latest iPhones as IP68: dust-tight, submersible at a depth and duration specified by the manufacturer. Apple specifies "maximum depth of 6 meters up to 30 minutes".