Apple

17467 readers

312 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:

No NSFW Content
No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
No Ads / Spamming
Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

MichelleG@lemmy.world

RoyalEngineering@lemmy.world

thisisdee@lemmy.world

158

Apple Explains Why It Won’t Make iPhones With Replaceable Batteries (www.inverse.com)

submitted 1 year ago by doctorcherry@lemmy.ml to c/apple_enthusiast@lemmy.world

159 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The waterproof excuse is crap

Yep. Galaxy S5, released 9 years ago with an IP67, removable battery, sd card and headphone jack with a back you could open with a fingernail.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Yep. Galaxy S5, released 9 years ago with an IP67, removable battery, sd card and headphone jack with a back you could open with a fingernail.

Spot on. They boast about how the iPhone is IP68, but IPX7 means...

Protected from immersion in water with a depth of up to 1 meter (or 3.3 feet) for up to 30 mins

There may be a tradeoff, but I'll take this level of waterproofing with a removable battery over being able to dunk my phone under water for 2 hours without a removable battery. Like that's an easy choice.

It's all moot anyway. This is just Apple trying to justify their anti-consumer standpoint of wanting to own the device after it's been bought, like every other fucking manufacturer out there. We will own nothing and we'll be happy about it.