this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2025
1316 points (98.8% liked)

Microblog Memes

6458 readers
4632 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You need to stop believing you know anything about game theory because the Dunning-Kruger klaxon is going off and you can't seem to hear it.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You claim I don't, but you don't show it. That's the big red flag for "Dunning-Kruger" - unsubstantiated claims, or claims with faulty arguments behind them.

And for the love of god, don't respond to that with anything but specific responses to the actual claims I made. I cannot take anymore of these circular arguments today.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Go read even a little bit of game theory, like an introductory video on YouTube even, before you start claiming it supports your illogical nonsense take. Introductory test: how many players?

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And, lo and behold, he did not respond with specific responses to the actual claims I made. On reddit, this is when I would hit the "block" button, because I know they're just wasting my time. But here they just keep responding forever until I stop responding myself.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Crazy. Your debating opponents don't have to follow your weird rules you set in advance for how they are allowed to contradict you on the Internet, and it's an obvious fallacy to infer truth or falsehood based on whether someone obeys you or not.

There's a block button. You are free to use it, but the claim I was addressing was your clearly false claim to understand game theory.

Anyone who claims that game theory somehow meant that Shill Stein could have been president is talking out of the wrong orifice.